Scientific Biblical Studies - Current Articles
The Life Foundations
Nexus
THE AUTHORITATIVELY
CORRECT TRANSDIALECTION OF THE KING JAMES
BIBLE
THE 1769 TRANSDIALECTION OF THE KING JAMES
BIBLE
By Dr. Michael J. Bisconti
All of the transdialections
of the King James Bible agree in meaning once non-1769 errors in printing are
corrected. They do not all agree in
spelling. The Unity Principle, which is
based on the TBI-IOTC Principle,
dictates that the 1769 transdialection
of the King James Bible is the authoritatively correct transdialection
of the King James Bible. The Unity
Principle states:
Unity requires that Christians follow a
universal rule. In the absence of a
universal rule, Christians must follow a prevalent rule.
The 1769 transdialection
of the King James Bible is the prevalent transdialection
of the King James Bible. Note that the
other transdialections
of the King James Bible are either correct once non-1769 errors in printing are
corrected or correct and did not contain errors in printing but that they are
not authoritatively correct.
This means that if there were any disagreement between a non-1769 transdialection
of the King James Bible and the 1769 transdialection
of the King James Bible, WHICH THERE IS NOT ONCE NON-1769 ERRORS IN
PRINTING ARE CORRECTED, it would be the 1769 transdialection
of the King James Bible that would have to be followed. Obviously, if we were not aware of the
non-1769 printing errors, we would have another reason why the 1769 transdialection
of the King James Bible would have to be followed. There would not be an agreement in meaning between the 1769 transdialection
of the King James Bible and the printed 1611 dialection (literature written in
a specific dialect of a language) of the King James Bible and the other
non-1769 transdialections
of the King James Bible that contain printing errors.